On November 23, 2008, John saw something that made him finally realize why God had orchestrated the overturning of the altar. He realized that, through the incident, God was telling a John in that church to look under the altar in his namesake's inspired vision (Rev. 6:9-11), tell God what he sees, and ask God in faith for the revelation of who the souls under the altar are. Asking in faith means believing that you will receive the revelation (Mat. 21:22, Mark 11:24). Out of all the Christians who have ever asked God for that revelation, none had more faith in receiving it than John; because why would God orchestrate the overturning of the altar in John's church if it was not to give John the revelation of who the souls under the altar are? That's why John would receive the revelation in about four months, and it would turn out to be bad news for those of us who are living on the earth.

On March 22, 2009, John saw something which confirmed that he had received the revelation of who the souls under the altar are (Rev. 6:9-11). They are young victims of a continual human sacrifice which is happening today. We can know that it's a human sacrifice by the fact the souls are under the place of sacrifice, which is the altar (v9). We can know that the sacrifice is continual by the fact that the souls under the altar have brethren who are about to be killed as they were (v11). We can know that they are young victims by the fact that they did not wash their robes in the blood of the Lamb to whiten them, like the saints before the throne did (Rev. 7:14). Rather, the souls under the altar are being given new white robes (Rev. 6:11).

If they had washed their robes in the blood of the Lamb, then it would have meant that they lived long enough to incur the guilt of personal sin, thereby necessitating that they wash their robes in the blood of the Lamb (Jesus Christ) to whiten them. But because they are being given new white robes, it means that they were killed before they were old enough to incur the guilt of personal sin. In other words, they are YOUNG victims of a continual human sacrifice. Very few infants are being killed today. However, thousands of fetuses are killed in the womb each day by abortion. John was hoping that fetuses do not have souls.

But on February 12, 2015, John saw the mother of his children in a condition which confirmed in his mind that fetuses do have souls from the moment of implantation (if not sooner). We can know this by the fact that Adam became a living soul when the breath of life was breathed into him (Gen. 2:7) and oxygen is breathed into an embryo the moment it has implanted in the womb. This is confirmed in the account of Elijah raising the widow's son from the dead (1Ki. 17:17-24). The soul left the boy's body when he stopped breathing, and the soul came back into his body when he started breathing again.

Also, the law of jealousy (Num. 5:12-31) was not about abortion being done in the temple. Verse 28 says that if the wife, who drank the potion in the temple, had been faithful, then she would be "sown with seed" (Heb. zara zera). This proves that the wife had not yet been sown with seed at the time she was taken to the temple. It must have been understood that if God had to put the spirit of jealousy on the husband (because of his wife's adultery), then God would do it before the wife was sown with the adulterer's seed. Abortions were never done in the temple.

It should also be noted that the souls under the altar cry out to their "Master" (Gr. despotes) rather than to their "Lord" (Gr. kyrios). This is the only time, in all of St. John's inspired writings, that he wrote despotes. In comparison, he wrote kyrios 77 times. This confirms that the sacrificial victims are not baptized Christians (not to mention the fact that they aren't asking for their killers to be forgiven). The fact that the human sacrifice is happening today is bad news for us, because it means that the victims are asking when their blood will be avenged on us (Rev. 6:10), and when God stops the sacrifice (v11), He will avenge their blood (Rev. 19:2).

On November 1, 2012, John told his new priest who the souls under the altar are and that he prays for them every month of all souls, which is November. The priest still remembered that conversation in 2023. John prays for them, because he believes that they are in a state of death similar to purgatory and that they cannot leave that state until the continual human sacrifice is stopped. Therefore, when he prays for them, he asks God to show us how we can help Him stop the sacrifice. At first, John thought we just need to keep trying to convince everyone around us to vote only for "pro-life" legislators and executives, especially since we always vote on or shortly after All Souls Day (November 2).

But it was becoming increasingly evident to John that the "pro-life" movement was never going to obtain the majority support that is needed to make abortion illegal, especially in states like California, Colorado, Illinois, and New York. John learned that we cannot ban abortion, because of the simple fact that the majority rule and the majority are opposed to banning abortion. A big reason why they are opposed is because there is no way to justly punish abortion if it was banned. John learned the way to justly punish abortion in a perfect world. It depended on knowing a person's intention; and because that's not possible in our imperfect world, there is no way we can justly punish abortion if it was banned.

But John heard about a type of abortion that has always been banned. It is forced abortion; and even though it's illegal, a few people were saying that it still happens. So, John began to pray for the souls who are killed by forced abortion, with the hope of getting an answer from God as to whether it happens and if so what we can do to help God stop it.

One day, John saw the picture below; and he was intrgued. Knowing that it might be an important piece of evidence, he saved it. It's a picture of a "pro-choice" man holding a homemade sign at counterprotest. The sign says, "Abortion stops me from paying child support." This is the motive behind a man forcing his pregnant girlfriend to get an abortion. It's the incentive for forced abortion. Forced abortion is also easy to get away with; because if the victim reports it, the accused person can simply deny having threatened her. Presumption of innocence makes it easy for the guilty one to get away with it. The evidence that forced abortion happens is that it is incentivized and it is easy to get away with.

But that is not enough evidence to prove that forced abortion happens. For proof, we turn to two studies. A 2023 study by the Lozier institute shows that 70% percent of abortions have at least some element of coercion, and a 2022 Harvard study shows that murder is a leading cause of death for pregnant women. The motive for this type of murder (double homicide) is the same as it is for forced abortion: to avoid having to pay child support. See RTCL Martyrs for the stories of such murder victims. Forced abortion happens often, because it's incentivized and it's easy to get away with. The only way we might be able to stop it is if there is a way we can disincentize it.

Sometime before February 21, 2018, John learned that advancements in DNA science had made it possible to obtain DNA evidence from a pregnant woman, proving paternity. It is called the non-invasive prenatal paternity test. The way the NIPP test works is that a woman, who is at least 7 weeks pregnant, gives up a blood sample and the name of the man who made her pregnant. Then their offspring's DNA, which is in the blood sample, can be compared to the father's DNA, thereby proving that he is in fact the father. The NIPP test is good news, because the fact that a 7-week pregnant female is now able to submit proof of paternity means that we are now able to craft a law, which would potentially stop forced abortion.

The proposed law would give every pregnant female the option to certify the creditorship of her offspring (the fact that he or she is owed prenatal and postnatal support), so that if anybody was to kill the creditor, the prenatal and postnatal support debts would not be forgiven, but would instead be converted into reimbursement for wrongful death, payable to the caretaker(s) of the child(ren) specified on the certificate of creditorship, or if none are specified then to the caretakers of the children known by the state to be underprivileged. The female who exercises this option would want to submit proof of paternity, in the form of a blood sample. This would disincentivize forced abortion, thereby eliminating the possibility of the crime happening.

In 2020, John wrote the first version of the bill. He also wrote an online petition, which was signed by about 200 people. For the next three years, he listened to those who found problems in the bill, and worked with God, through prayer, to fix the problems. The current version of the bill was completed in 2023. It is called the Right to Choose Life Act, because it would protect a woman's right to choose life. The petition was also able to be updated in 2023, because the basic idea behind the bill proposal has not changed. It was clear that the bill would stop forced abortion (by disincentivizing it). What was not clear is whether the bill would do anything to stop elective abortion.

Besides being a type of abortion, forced abortion is also a type of reproductive coercion (see Figure 2 below). As such, it is the common evil that both pro-choice and pro-life people oppose. Therefore, there is no legitimate reason for anyone to oppose the Right to Choose Life Act. The two excuses that people try to use for not signing the petition are: 1. that forced abortion doesn't happen, and 2. that no woman will exercise the option. Neither is a legitimate excuse. It is proven above that forced abortion happens often, and if a women does not exercise the option, then at least the blood of her offspring will not be on us; because we will have done everything in our power to save the life her offspring.

Here is the beauty of the Right to Choose Life Act. If the pregnant woman exercises the option (to certify the creditorship of her offsprig), then not only would she be disincentivizing forced abortion, but she would also be disincentivizing elective abortion. That's because it's not only the postnatal support debt that would be certified, but also the prenatal support debt. Pro-choice people oppose forced pregnancy and pro-life people oppose elective abortion. The Venn diagram in Figure 3 below shows the two conditions necessary for forced pregnancy to happen and the two conditions necessary for elective abortion to happen. The common condition is the woman wanting to get an abortion. But if elective abortion is disincentived, she will not want to get an abortion; and therefore, neither a forced pregnancy nor an elective abortion will take place.

Hence, the Right to Choose Life Act is not only the way to stop forced abortion, but it is also the way to stop forced pregnancy and elective abortion too. Only God could give us such an idea for a bill, and that's exactly what He did. It's a bill which changes the hearts and minds of women, and no man ever could have written it if God had not orchestrated the overturning of the altar during Mass at an Alabama catholic church.

In 2023, John learned that forced abortion is the most unholy sacrifice. Here is why. A sacrifice is an act of giving up something to obtain something else for oneself or for others (Collins Dictionary). As Christians, we know that the Most Holy Sacrifice was the act of giving up one's own life to obtain for others the remission of their debts to God. Only God's Son, Jesus Christ, was qualified to make the Most Holy Sacrifice, and he made it almost two thousand years ago (Mat. 6:12, 26:28; John 15:13). The opposite is the most unholy sacrifice. It is the act of giving up the life of another to obtain for oneself the remission of one's debt to the other.

We incur debts "as a result of doing something" (Collins Dictionary). The only thing a man does, which results in him incurring a postnatal support debt to his offspring, is to impregnate a female. Therefore, a man incurs a postnatal support debt when he impregnates a female; and if she consented to the act which caused the pregnancy, then she incurs a prenatal suppor debt to their offspring. Support consists of the essentials of life (oxygen, water, food, protection, and care when needed). If a man forces his pregnant girlfriend to get an abortion, then he gives up the life of their offspring to obtain for himself the remission of his postnatal support debt to their offspring. That is the most unholy sacrifice.

John also learned that the "everlasting evangel" for those who live on earth (Rev. 14:6) consists of the Gospel of Christ for the unbaptized who live on earth plus this new evangel for the baptized who live on earth, the new evangel being that we, who are beneficiaries of the Most Holy Sacrifice, are now able to participate with God in stopping the most unholy sacrifice, by signing the THE PETITION TO PROTECT A WOMAN'S RIGHT TO CHOOSE LIFE. John realized that the revelation of the everlasting evangel began with the overturning of the altar on the Feast of the Guardian Angels. It's for that reason that John believes that his guardian angel is the one who holds the everlasting evangel (Rev. 14:6).

As for bringing the new evangel to the baptized, John learned a couple of things. First, people will not believe the new evangel unless it is announced to them in the house of God. Since, bishops and elders are in charge of what gets announced in the house of God, the new evangelization must begin with church leadership. The second thing that John learned is that a new evangelist is not accepted in his own church. Therefore, those of us who become new evangelists will have to bring the new evangel to the leadership of churches that we do not belong to. That way, we do unto other churches what we want done unto our own church.